EXPOSED: The US is Facing The BIGGEST Threat Of The Century… So pay chose attention because this VIDEO will change your life forever for the good!
Other than the obvious consequences, what might we expect from a partial economic collapse? A total collapse of the economy would throw the nation into utter chaos. But what if we endure an economic depression, or a severe and long-lasting downturn? I think that some of the effects are not so obvious.
1. The college and university system will collapse
As I explained in this previous post, the system of higher education is a house of cards. The cost of getting a college degree has risen sharply and steadily, while real income has remained relatively flat. The price rise is due to the easy availability of grants and loans for education. But with so many persons getting a college degree, its value in the marketplace has plummeted. Many college grads are out of work, or they are working in a job that does not require a degree. Eventually, this practice of paying more and more, for something that is worth less and less, will collapse the system. Colleges and universities will not have enough paying students, and professors will not agree to a drastic pay cut. Overhead expenses are far too high.
All that is needed is an economic collapse, or partial collapse, to topple this house of cards. Many universities and colleges will be forced by economics to shut down.
The current U.S. agricultural system is based on the expectation of high yields. But high yields are obtained by high inputs — all the things that go into growing the crop, including lots of fertilizer, perhaps irrigation, herbicides, pesticides, labor, machinery. Then those high yields are sold and the money is then used to fund the inputs for the next crop cycle.
An economic collapse will mean that farmers will not be able to afford all the inputs needed for high yields. And when yields fall, the amount of money from that crop will be less. Then the next crop cycle will have even less money for inputs, resulting in even lower yields. And the process will continue — lower yields, less money, lower inputs — until many farmers are out of business and a food crisis results.
3. Violent crime will increase
When people lack money and food, they become desperate. And desperate people do desperate things. Theft and robbery will skyrocket, and people will be afraid in their homes, and afraid to go out in the community. Even a quick trip to the market will become risky. Sales of most goods will plummet, causing the economic crisis to worsen. Protests will turn violent. Home invasion robberies will become much more common. Many people will be killed or injured as a result of this increase in violent crimes.
4. Law enforcement will be overwhelmed
The law enforcement system in the U.S. is commercial. Officers are paid. We don’t keep a large excess of officers on the payroll, just in case crime sharply increases. So it is relatively easy for the system to be overwhelmed. And that means a call to 911 might not bring the police to your door in time, if at all. Those who have firearms for home defense will be much better off than those who rely solely on the police. But many households have no firearms. And that means that robberies will increase, and so will the economic damage and the number of injuries and deaths.
5. The healthcare system will be overwhelmed
The healthcare system is also commercial, and lacks a safety margin in the form of excess doctors and nurses. Hospitals operate at close to capacity. A sudden increase in persons who are sick or injured will overwhelm the system.
The aforementioned increase in violent crime will undoubtedly increase injuries. But it is less obvious that a disruption to the food production and distribution system will increase illnesses. Plenty of good healthy food is the first line of defense against illness. Malnourished persons are much more likely to get sick. So an extended disruption to the food supply will cause an increase in illnesses.
6. Travel anywhere will become dangerous
As a result of all the above described problems, travel will be dangerous. Want to make a quick trip to the supermarket? You risk having your house robbed, if it is left unoccupied. And you risk being attacked on your way back from the market. Robbers might wait outside the market and follow anyone who looks like they purchased a lot of food.
There will be protests in many places, and violence will often break out. People who are hungry and afraid do not make the best decisions. Then there is the cultural aspect of the situation. We live in a culture that tells us to expect the government to take care of us, and to protest whenever anything doesn’t go our way. Ironically, self-sufficiency is abhorrent to our narcissistic culture.
I expect that the roadways will be dangerous, as violent criminals will see travelers as easier targets than homes.
7. The death rate will jump higher
People will be malnourished because of the disruption in the food supply, so they will get sick more easily. Violent crimes and violent protests will result in many more injuries than usual. And yet healthcare will be much more difficult to access. There will be a shortage of hospital beds. It will be difficult to get a doctor’s appointment. There may be a shortage of prescription and OTC medications.
All of these factors will make life a riskier endeavor.
Now if you are a seasoned prepper, who has long considered the dangers inherent in an economic collapse, you may have anticipated some of the above consequences. But I hope I’ve added to your understanding of the possible problems that we may soon face.
A stock market fall can occur as a result of a large disastrous event, an economic crisis, or the bursting of a long-term speculative bubble. Reactionary public fear in response to a stock market fall can also be a key cause, prompting panic selling that further depresses prices.
A stock market crash is a sudden or severe drop in overall share prices, usually within a day.
Stock market crashes can be due to economic or natural disasters, speculation, or investor panic.
Investors can prepare for stock market crashes by diversifying portfolios and shifting to CDs or bonds.
The stock market is constantly moving, with prices of individual equities rising and falling throughout the trading day. Whenever the majority of them or a representative group of them, called a stock market index takes an especially large dive, a panicked cry often arises: “The stock market has crashed!”
Stock market crashes are certainly scary. Equities across the board decline in value. Investors lose enormous sums of money on paper, anyway. But what causes them? And what are the aftereffects?
Here is a closer look at what a stock market crash is and what you need to know before one impacts your portfolio.
What causes a stock market crash?
Historically, stock market crashes often occur after a long period of economic and market growth. Confidence in the economy, steady stock gains, and low unemployment are all drivers of bull markets, as these sustained rallies are known. As more and more stocks are purchased, prices go up both for individual equities and the stock indexes themselves.
But in the world of securities, prices can’t keep rising indefinitely, and bull markets can only last for so long. Sometimes it’s a general shift in sentiment, as in 1929, but usually, some precipitating event occurs.
Numerous things can cause a stock market to crash, including:
Panic: This is one of the most common contributing factors to a crash. Stockholders who fear the value of their investments are in danger of dropping will sell their shares to protect their money. As prices begin to drop, the fear spreads, more sales ensue, and this can lead to a crash. Anything from a major player in the market having financial trouble to fears about the impact specific legislation may have can cause scores of investors to panic and sell off stock.
Natural or man-made disasters: These can include all sorts of catastrophes, from floods to wars to pandemics. Case in point: the coronavirus-induced crash of March 2020. As the realization of the spread of COVID-19 began to take hold, the economic outlook for the US and countries worldwide began to look grim. While countries announced travel limitations, mandatory business shutdowns, and quarantines, consumers stocked up on essential supplies causing shortages, companies began protecting profit margins through layoffs and furloughs, and investors started selling off stocks.
Excessive leverage: When things are going well, leverage (a.k.a. “borrowed money”) can seem like an excellent tool. For example, if I buy 1,00,000 worth of stock and it rises by 20%, I made 20,000. If I borrow an additional 1,00,000 and bought 2,00,000 worth of the same stock, I’d make 40,000 doubling my profits.
On the other hand, when things move against you, leverage can be downright dangerous. Let’s say that my same 1,00,000 stock investment dropped by 50%. It would sting, but I’d still have 50,000. If I had borrowed an additional 1,00,000, a 50% drop would wipe me out completely.
Excessive leverage can create a downward spiral in stocks when things turn sour. As prices drop, firms and investors with lots of leverage are forced to sell, which in turn drives prices down even further. The most notable occasion was the Crash of 1929, in which excessive purchasing of stocks on margin played a major role.
Interest rates and inflation: Generally speaking, rising interest rates are a negative catalyst for stocks and the economy in general.
This is especially true for income-focused stocks, such as real estate investment trusts (REITs). Investors buy these stocks specifically for their dividend yields, and rising market interest rates put downward pressure on these stocks. As a simplified illustration, if a 10-year Treasury note yields 3% and a certain REIT yields 5%, it may seem worth the extra risk to income-seeking investors to choose the REIT.
On the other hand, if the 10-year Treasury’s yield spikes to 4%, the REIT’s dividend will (roughly) need to rise proportionally to attract investors. And lower stock prices translate to higher dividend yields, on a percentage basis.
From an economic standpoint, higher interest rates mean higher borrowing costs, which tends to slow down purchasing activity, which can in turn cause stocks to dive. So, if the 30-year mortgage rate were to spike to, say, 6%, it could dramatically slow down the housing market and cause homebuilder stocks to take a hit.
Political risks: While nobody has a crystal ball that can predict the future, it’s a safe bet that the stock market wouldn’t like it much if the U.S. went to war with, say, North Korea.
Markets like stability and wars, and political risk represent the exact opposite. For instance, the Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped by more than 7% during the first trading session following the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks, as the uncertainty surrounding the attacks and the next moves spooked investors.
Tax changes: The recent Tax Cuts and Jobs Act should certainly have the effect of higher corporate earnings and is likely to be a generally positive catalyst for the market.
On the other hand, tax increases can have the opposite effect. One potential way to fix the Social Security funding problem would be to raise payroll taxes on employees and employers. There are several ways this could happen, but this would mean lower paychecks for workers and higher expenses for employers, and could certainly be a negative catalyst.
The same could be said if short-term capital gains taxes or dividends lose their favorable treatment, if the corporate income tax is raised in the future, or if any other significant tax hikes occur. This isn’t likely to happen while the Republican Party is in power, but it’s certainly possible in the future.
Economic crises: A problem in industry or one section of the economy often has a ripple effect. One example is the subprime mortgage crisis of 2007-2008. Earlier in the decade, deregulation in the banking industry had led to an increase in mortgages to high-risk borrowers. When these borrowers began defaulting on payments, home prices dropped, and the housing market collapsed. Many of the now-worthless mortgages had been packaged and sold off to institutional investors who in turn lost billions. Big firms began to fold, and from Sept. 19 to Oct. 10, the Dow Jones Industrial Index declined 3,600 points.
Speculation: When you have people and companies investing in a sector in the hopes that an asset or security will grow or based on future performance expectations, you have speculation that often creates a bubble. If the performance disappoints, and the hype doesn’t live up to reality, the bubble bursts, and a mass sell-off occurs.
What happens when a stock market crashes?
There are many definitions of what a stock market crash is. Some categorize a crash strictly as a stock market or a stock market index (a representative sampling of stocks) losing more than 10% of its value in a single day. Others provide a more general view, simply stating that a crash is a significant or dramatic loss in the stock market’s value, and the prices of shares overall, usually within a short period.
Any way you look at it, a stock market crash happens when confidence and value placed in publicly traded assets go down, causing investors to sell their positions, and move away from active investing, and toward keeping their money in cash, or the equivalent.
The impact of a crash can vary as well. Sometimes, it’s limited. For example, on Oct. 19, 1987, after five years in a strong bull market, the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) and S&P 500 both dropped more than 20%, following markets throughout Asia and across Europe. The crash was short and markets quickly recovered. Within a few days, the DJIA regained more than 43% of the points it lost and within nearly two years the market had recovered almost 100%.
At other times, the effects are widespread and longer-lasting. The most notorious example is the Crash of 1929. Stock prices dropped first on Oct. 24th, briefly rallied, and then went into free fall on Oct. 28-29. Ultimately, the market lost 85% of its value. Though not the sole cause, this crash was one of the contributing factors to the Great Depression, the worst economic period in American history, lasting nearly 10 years.
I want to present you one of the most interesting sites, where you will see new articles daily! www.321gold.com
The Promise (1947-1973): Historically, there existed a fundamental agreement between labor and capital, often referred to as the social contract, which dictated that for every 1% increase in the economic value generated by a worker (their productivity), their compensation would also rise by a corresponding 1%. This reciprocal relationship was widely perceived as equitable, ensuring that the benefits of increased efficiency and output were shared fairly between those who contributed their labor and those who provided the means of production. This arrangement fostered a sense of shared prosperity, where workers could reasonably expect their efforts to translate directly into an improved standard of living.
The Heist (1973-Today): This pivotal agreement, which once promised a fair exchange between labor and reward, was systematically dismantled. The consequences have been stark and undeniable. Since 1973, the productivity of the American worker has soared, demonstrating an increase of over 65%. This remarkable surge in output, a testament to dedication and innovation, has not been met with a commensurate rise in compensation. In sharp contrast, the inflation-adjusted pay for these same workers has stagnated, growing by less than 10% over the same period. This widening chasm between productivity and pay reveals a fundamental shift in the economic landscape, where the gains of increased efficiency are no longer equitably shared, leading to a significant erosion of the American worker’s economic standing.
The Takedown: They convinced you to work harder, smarter, faster. You did. You delivered 65% more value. And they paid you almost nothing for it. All that extra wealth you created—the trillions of dollars—was stolen directly from your paycheck.
This wasn’t a natural progression of the economy; it was a deliberate strategy, a silent war declared on the American worker. For decades, a systematic dismantling of labor protections, a weakening of unions, and a fervent push for “efficiency” paved the way for this grand heist. Companies reaped record profits, executives received astronomical bonuses, and shareholders saw their portfolios swell, all while the average worker’s wages stagnated or barely kept pace with inflation.
The promise was always the same: if you just pushed a little harder, if you adopted the latest productivity tools, if you embraced the “gig economy,” you would share in the prosperity. But that promise was a mirage. The “trickle-down” never reached the bottom. Instead, the wealth flowed upwards, concentrating in the hands of a select few, leaving the vast majority struggling to keep up with rising living costs, dwindling benefits, and an ever-increasing sense of precarity. The American Dream, once built on the bedrock of fair labor and a path to upward mobility, began to erode, replaced by a new reality where hard work no longer guaranteed a fair share of the bounty. This was the first offensive, and the American worker, unknowingly, bore the brunt of the assault.
CRIME #2: THE CEO PAY EXPLOSION
The Old Rule (1965): The average CEO of a major company made 20 times what their typical worker made. This was seen as a responsible balance.
The New Rule (Today): The chasm between the compensation of top executives and their average employees has widened to an astonishing degree, reaching a point where the typical CEO now earns a staggering 350 times what their typical worker brings home. This isn’t a static figure; in certain years, this disparity has even surged past the 400-to-1 mark, highlighting a troubling trend in corporate compensation structures. This immense gap isn’t just a matter of numbers; it reflects a fundamental shift in how value is perceived and distributed within companies, raising questions about fairness, economic equality, and the very definition of a “living wage” for the vast majority of the workforce. The increasing concentration of wealth at the very top, while wages for the rank and file stagnate or grow minimally, has profound implications for social mobility, consumer spending, and the overall health of the economy.
The Takedown: This isn’t a reflection of 20-fold genius. It’s the insidious outcome of a system deliberately designed to favor the powerful. The boardroom, once a place of strategic leadership, devolved into an exclusive, self-serving club. Within its insulated walls, executives awarded themselves exorbitant paychecks, diverting vast sums of money that rightfully belonged to the very individuals who powered their success: the American worker. This capital, generated by their labor and dedication, should have translated into substantial raises, comprehensive benefits, and secure pensions. Instead, it became a private fund for the elite, enriching a select few at the expense of the many, systematically undermining the economic well-being and future security of the workforce. This systematic siphoning of wealth is not an accident; it is the calculated result of a deeply flawed and deliberately rigged system that prioritizes corporate greed over the prosperity of its people.
CRIME #3: THE DISAPPEARING PENSION
The Old Rule (1980): At the peak of American industrial strength, a remarkable figure – over 60% of the nation’s workforce – enjoyed the security of a defined-benefit pension. This wasn’t merely a savings plan; it was a promise, a guarantee of a stable and predictable income throughout their retirement years. This robust system provided a bedrock of financial certainty for millions of families, allowing them to plan for the future with confidence, knowing that their golden years would be cushioned by a reliable stream of income, independent of market fluctuations or individual investment decisions. It represented a fundamental component of the social contract between employers and employees, a testament to an era where corporate responsibility extended beyond immediate profits to encompass the long-term well-being of its workforce. This widespread access to defined-benefit pensions played a crucial role in fostering economic stability, empowering workers, and shaping the American middle class.
The New Rule (Today): This alarming statistic marks a dramatic decline in an area once considered a cornerstone of American economic strength and worker protection. The percentage of the workforce represented by unions has plummeted to less than 15%, a stark contrast to historical highs. This collapse signifies a significant shift in the power dynamics between labor and management, leading to widespread implications for wages, benefits, working conditions, and the overall economic security of American workers. The erosion of union membership is not merely a number; it represents a fundamental change in the landscape of the American labor movement, weakening its ability to advocate for fair treatment and a living wage for a vast segment of the population.
The Takedown: The American dream, once built on the bedrock of secure employment and a comfortable retirement, has been systematically dismantled. They, the architects of this economic shift, didn’t just tinker with the system; they fundamentally overhauled it, exchanging the promise of a secure retirement for the perilous gamble of a 401(k). This move, far from an improvement, effectively hitched the financial security of millions of workers to the volatile whims of Wall Street – the very same institution whose reckless behavior triggered the devastating market crash of 2008.
This wasn’t an accidental outcome but a deliberate transfer of risk. Corporations, once responsible for managing pension funds and ensuring their employees’ golden years, deftly sidestepped that obligation. They shed the burden from their own balance sheets, effectively pushing the financial precarity from their boardrooms directly onto the kitchen tables of working-class families. The individual, once shielded by collective responsibility, was now singularly exposed to the market’s unpredictable surges and devastating downturns, forced to become an amateur investment manager in a complex and often unforgiving financial landscape. This shift represents a profound betrayal of the social contract, leaving the American worker more vulnerable than ever before.
CRIME #4: THE UNION BUST
The Peak (1954): In the mid-20th century, a significant portion of the American private-sector workforce—approximately 35%—was represented by labor unions. This robust union membership served as a crucial counter-balance to the inherent power of corporations. Unions played a vital role in advocating for workers’ rights, negotiating for fair wages, safe working conditions, and reasonable benefits, thereby contributing to a more equitable distribution of wealth and influence in the economy. This period is often seen as a golden age for the American worker, where collective bargaining provided a powerful voice that ensured employees were not merely cogs in the industrial machine but valued contributors with a share in the nation’s prosperity. The presence of strong unions compelled businesses to consider the welfare of their employees, fostering an environment where a significant portion of the workforce enjoyed a degree of economic security and upward mobility that is less prevalent in later decades. This era truly represented a time when the power dynamics between labor and capital were more evenly matched, due in no small part to the widespread embrace of unionization.
The Collapse (Today): That number, which once represented a significant portion of the workforce, has been systematically crushed, plummeting to a mere 6%. This drastic decline reflects a concerted and sustained effort to dismantle the power and influence of the American worker, stripping away their collective bargaining rights and eroding their economic security. The consequences of this systematic crushing are far-reaching, impacting not only individual livelihoods but also the broader economic landscape and the very fabric of American society.
The Takedown: The most crucial metric on this scoreboard is undeniably the strength and prevalence of labor unions. These organizations stood as the singular, well-structured, and adequately financed entities whose fundamental purpose was to champion the cause of the average worker, ensuring they received a fair share of the profits generated by their labor. The deliberate and systematic dismantling of these unions was not merely an incidental outcome, but rather a calculated and indispensable prerequisite for the entire audacious economic heist that followed. Without the formidable opposition posed by organized labor, the path was cleared for a redistribution of wealth that overwhelmingly favored corporate interests and the ownership class, at the direct expense of the working population. Their destruction effectively neutralized the primary force dedicated to economic justice and equity for the American worker, setting the stage for an era of unprecedented wage stagnation, benefit erosion, and increasing income inequality.
These numbers are not abstract. They are the reason you feel it every day:
The Erosion of the American Dream: A Generational Crisis
The American Dream, once a beacon of opportunity where a single income could comfortably support a family, has become an increasingly elusive ideal for many. The stark realities of modern economic life paint a sobering picture, revealing a systemic shift that has fundamentally altered the financial landscape for the average worker.
The Two-Income Trap: Fifty years ago, the notion of a single income sustaining a household, including homeownership, education, and a comfortable retirement, was not just a pipe dream but a common reality. Today, the necessity of two incomes to achieve a comparable standard of living highlights a dramatic and alarming decline in purchasing power. This isn’t merely an anecdotal observation; it’s a testament to the stagnation of wages relative to the skyrocketing costs of essential goods and services, from housing and healthcare to education and everyday necessities. The economic pressure on families is immense, often leading to increased stress and a diminished quality of life, as both parents are compelled to work simply to keep pace.
The Disappearance of Secure Retirement: For previous generations, the promise of a dignified retirement often came in the form of a pension – a guaranteed income stream that provided security and peace of mind in one’s golden years. Today, pensions are largely a relic of the past, replaced by the precariousness of the 401(k). This shift has transferred the burden and risk of retirement planning squarely onto the shoulders of individual workers. The anxiety associated with a 401(k) statement is palpable, as market fluctuations, insufficient contributions, and a lack of financial literacy can easily jeopardize one’s future. The dream of a comfortable retirement has been replaced by a pervasive fear of outliving one’s savings, forcing many to work longer or postpone retirement indefinitely.
The Widening Chasm of Inequality: The chasm between the compensation of corporate executives and the average worker has grown to an unprecedented and morally questionable scale. The fact that a CEO’s annual bonus can eclipse the entire payroll of a small town underscores a profound imbalance in our economic system. This disparity is not merely a matter of unfairness; it reflects a fundamental breakdown in the distribution of wealth and value. While executive compensation continues to soar, often regardless of company performance or worker productivity, the wages of the frontline employees who generate that wealth remain stagnant. This ever-widening gap fuels resentment, erodes trust in corporate leadership, and contributes to a sense of economic injustice that undermines the very fabric of society. It raises critical questions about corporate accountability, ethical compensation practices, and the long-term sustainability of an economic model that disproportionately rewards the few at the expense of the many.
This was not an accident. It was a transfer. The money that should have been in your pocket was moved. The security that should have been yours was dismantled.
The Powell Memo declared the war. The Volcker Shock was the first battle. And these numbers—your stagnant paycheck, their exploding bonuses, your vanished pension—are the territory they conquered.
I want to present you one of the most interesting sites, where you will see new articles daily! www.321gold.com
Substitution is possible when silver is used only for a general property (conductivity, reflectivity, corrosion resistance), so industry will replace it where alternatives match performance.
Silver remains hard to eliminate where its unique combination of properties or small quantity per part make substitution impractical or uneconomic.
Even if prices spike, market responses (recycling, increased mining and byproduct recovery) and available reserves make total abandonment unlikely.
By: Tom Chandler- In my oipnion, silver used in industrial applications in electric contacts, and other industrial applications will not be abandoned..
Fifty (50) years ago I worked at a factory in Connectocut where we made hundreds of silver bearing alloys, some for industry, some for the arts, and some for culinary (Flatware). When the price for silver jumped dramatically in 1980 after the Hunt brothers attempted to corner the silver market and the price jumped over 700% , I witnessed the outcome.
Silver tableware market was devastated, Where it was once common to give silver flatware for wedding gifts , the outcome was fast with flatware cost jumping from hundreds per set to thousands.
On the other hand, silver and silver alloy used in electrical contacts for switchgears and relays was nescessary in most applications and the overall cost increase to the component assembly was not significant as the unit may only use ounces of silver
Silver was a major component in a silver- cadmium -indium alloy used as nuclear control rods. This would not be easily replaced or substituted
Silver for jewelry saw a temporary dive.
Silver alloys for brazing just became for costly, but they were still necessary as the silver content affected the brazing temperature profile of the processes that coud not be replaced.
An offshoot of the high silver pricce resulted a major recycling binge.
We saw old silver coins ( dollars) from US being remelted,
People were selling thier old flatware gifts to scrap dealers for cash. that were remelted into sivler items for indistrial applications
People wearing silver chains on their neck were being attacked on the streets on NYC where thr thieves could sell the stolen silver to the market on 42nd street.
The Canadian government invoked emergency powers and froze 210 bank accounts holding $7.8 million.
No trial. No due process. Just the government reaching into private citizens’ finances and turning off their money like flipping a light switch.
Families couldn’t buy groceries. Parents couldn’t pay rent. People who’d donated $50 to the protest found their accounts frozen.
And it happened in a Western democracy. In 2022. Not in some dystopian novel.
Now imagine that kind of power in a world where all money is digital, trackable, and programmable.
Where the government or corporations can monitor every purchase you make, decide what you’re allowed to buy, and shut off your financial life if you step out of line.
That world is closer than you think.
And Florida just became the first state to say: Not here. Not ever.
What Nobody’s Telling You About Digital Currency
Right now, only about 14% of U.S. consumer payments are made with cash. The rest are digital — cards, apps, electronic transfers.
That’s convenient. I use my debit card constantly.
But here’s what most people don’t realize:
Every digital payment leaves a trail. Banks and payment platforms automatically record where you shop, when you shop, what you buy.
Right now, that data is somewhat protected by privacy laws and corporate policies.
But what if the government issued its own digital currency — and gave itself direct access to all that data?
That’s exactly what a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) would do.
A CBDC is government-issued digital money that can be:
Tracked in real-time
Programmed with restrictions
Remotely controlled or frozen
Set to expire if not spent by a deadline
This isn’t hypothetical. It’s already happening.
What China Is Already Doing With Digital Currency
China’s digital yuan is 100% trackable and programmable.
Authorities can:
Monitor every transaction in detail
Set limits on how money is used
Control which goods can be purchased
Make money expire (use it by deadline or lose it)
Translation: The government can watch everything you buy and decide whether you’re allowed to buy it.
Think that can’t happen here?
President Biden ordered studies into a U.S. CBDC in 2022.
Over 1.5 billion people worldwide already live in countries with CBDC pilot programs.
And the early results should alarm every American who values freedom.
How Governments Use Digital Currency to Control Citizens
Nigeria: Force People Into Digital Money by Choking Off Cash
Nigeria launched a government digital currency. Adoption was under 0.5% — people didn’t want it.
So the government created a cash shortage to force people onto the digital system.
Result? Public chaos. Economic disruption. Riots.
But the government got what it wanted: control.
Thailand: Your Money Only Works Where Government Allows
Thailand’s new digital wallet restricts where people can spend money — limiting purchases to government-approved items in your home district.
Think about what that means:
You can’t drive to the next town and buy what you want with your own money. The government decides what’s “approved” and what’s not.
The Pattern Is Clear
When governments control the currency, they control the people.
And once that infrastructure is built, there’s no putting the genie back in the bottle.
Florida Drew the Line (And Your State Should Too)
This year, Florida enacted the first-in-the-nation law explicitly banning any federal CBDC from being treated as money in our state.
Translation: If the federal government issues a “digital dollar” that allows tracking or control, it won’t be recognized in Florida.
Governor DeSantis signed it with this statement:
“The government and large credit card companies should not have the power to shut off access to your hard-earned money because they disagree with your politics.”
At least a dozen other states — including Indiana, Alabama, and South Dakota — are considering similar bans.
Why?
Because we’ve already seen what happens when financial institutions can punish people for their beliefs.
The “Debanking” Scandal: When Banks Cancel You for Your Views
Financial surveillance isn’t just a government problem. Corporations are doing it too.
PayPal Wanted to Fine You $2,500 for “Misinformation”
Last year, PayPal briefly announced a policy allowing them to withdraw $2,500 from your account for spreading “misinformation.”
They backed off after massive backlash and claimed it was an “error.”
But the intent was clear: A tech platform thought it could directly punish you — with your own money — for saying something they didn’t like.
UK Banker Scandal: Closing Accounts Over Politics
In the UK, a major bank (Coutts, under NatWest Group) closed politician Nigel Farage’s account because his political views didn’t align with the bank’s “values.”
Internal documents showed his opinions on Brexit were noted in the decision.
It wasn’t isolated. Banks in Britain were shutting over 1,000 accounts every working day.
The scandal forced resignations of top bank executives and a government inquiry into what’s now called “debanking.”
It’s Happening in America Too
JPMorgan Chase quietly dropped rapper Kanye West, giving him 60 days to move his accounts after public controversies.
Chase bank briefly barred General Mike Flynn’s family, citing “reputational risk,” then reversed after public outcry.
These are famous people with resources to fight back.
What happens to you — a regular parent, a small business owner, a church donor — if a bank decides you’re “risky” because of your politics or faith?
How This Threatens Every Parent and Family
Let me make this personal.
Imagine:
You donate to your church’s building fund. Your payment app flags “religious organization” and limits future donations.
You buy a children’s book about faith. The algorithm notes “controversial content” and downgrades your credit score.
You attend a school board meeting protesting curriculum. Someone films you. Six months later, your bank account is suddenly “under review for reputational risk.”
Your teenager uses your card to buy a hunting rifle for a school shooting sports team. The transaction is flagged. Your family is now on a watchlist.
Sound far-fetched?
Florida just banned credit card companies from using special tracking codes that would create a registry of gun purchases.
Why? Because major card networks were discussing tagging firearm store purchases “to monitor mass shootings.”
Privacy advocates warned it would be misused to surveil lawful gun owners.
Florida said: Not here.
Your Right to Privacy Starts With Cash
Here’s something the digital payment companies don’t want you to know:
72% of Americans want to keep the ability to make some purchases completely private — by using cash.
74% of Americans oppose any digital dollar that lets government control what people can buy.
Over half of Americans still carry cash daily or weekly.
45% say they’d be upset if the U.S. became fully cashless. (Only 9% would be happy.)
Even Gen Z and Millennials — the most digital generations — about half say they’re not ready to give up cash, mostly due to privacy and fees.
Cash = privacy and autonomy.
When you pay with cash:
No data trail to mine
No algorithm deciding if you’re “allowed” to buy something
No corporation or government watching
No fees extracted
That’s why they want to eliminate it.
The Slippery Slope We’re Already On
We’ve seen the preview:
Stores and stadiums going “card only”
Apps that won’t accept cash
Schools forcing digital payment platforms (with fees)
Venues where your legal tender is “not accepted here”
Each step normalizes a cashless world.
And once cash is gone, every transaction you make can be:
Tracked
Analyzed
Sold to marketers
Reviewed by algorithms
Flagged for “suspicious activity”
Used against you
In China, apps like WeChat Pay are convenient — and integrated with government monitoring.
Reports show accounts automatically frozen for:
Buying religious materials
Having low “social credit” scores
Behavior the government doesn’t like
Your money turned off as punishment.
Why Florida’s Law Matters for Every State
Florida’s Consumer Payment Rights law does three critical things:
1. Bans Federal CBDCs
No programmable, trackable government digital currency will be recognized in Florida.
2. Protects Against Financial Discrimination
Banks and payment processors can’t cut you off for lawful political or religious activity.
3. Preserves Your Right to Use Cash
Legal tender remains legal — you can’t be forced into digital-only systems.
This is preventative legislation.
It’s easier to stop surveillance infrastructure from being built than to dismantle it after the fact.
Think of it like this:
You don’t wait until your house is on fire to install smoke detectors.
You don’t wait until your kid is drowning to teach them to swim.
And you don’t wait until government has total financial control to protect freedom.
The Europe Lesson: Even They’re Worried
The European Union — not exactly a libertarian stronghold — is moving to legally guarantee citizens’ right to use cash alongside any digital euro.
Why?
Because even EU regulators recognize that inclusion and privacy require multiple options.
They understand what happens when a single system has monopoly power over money.
If Europe gets it, why can’t Washington?
What This Means for Your Family
Practical implications if we don’t act:
Your Kids’ Future
Every purchase they make tracked from childhood
Credit scores influenced by “approved” vs “unapproved” purchases
Social pressure to conform because financial systems punish deviation
Your Business
Can’t accept cash (excludes customers)
Must use approved payment processors (with fees and surveillance)
Risk of being “debanked” if someone doesn’t like your values
Your Faith
Churches monitored through donation tracking
Religious material purchases flagged
Financial pressure to moderate beliefs
Your Politics
Donations tracked and used against you
Protest support = financial risk
Self-censorship to protect bank account
Emergencies
Power outage = no way to buy food (digital systems down)
Banking error = frozen out of economy
Cyber attack = commerce stops entirely
Cash is the backup system when digital fails.
Cash is the privacy tool when surveillance overreaches.
Cash is the freedom option when corporations or government get too powerful.
What You Can Do Right Now
1. Support Cash Acceptance Laws in Your State
Find your state legislators. Tell them to follow Florida’s lead.
Model language: “I support legislation banning federal CBDCs and protecting consumers’ right to use cash. Financial freedom and privacy must be protected.”
2. Use Cash Regularly
The more we use it, the harder it is to eliminate.
Pay cash at local businesses when possible
Keep cash in your emergency kit ($500+ in small bills)
Teach your kids to use physical money
3. Demand Transparency from Banks
Ask your bank:
What’s your policy on closing accounts for political/religious reasons?
Do you share transaction data with third parties?
Will you commit to not participating in CBDC surveillance?
If they won’t answer, find a bank that will.
4. Support the Payment Choice Act
Federal legislation requiring businesses to accept cash for transactions under $500.
Contact your U.S. Representative and Senators. Tell them to co-sponsor it.
5. Educate Your Community
Most people have no idea this is happening.
Share this article. Talk about it at church, PTA meetings, your book club.
This isn’t partisan. It’s freedom.
The Bottom Line
Your money should be yours.
Period.
No government should be able to program it, track it, or turn it off because you donated to the “wrong” cause or said something unpopular.
No corporation should be able to cut you off from the financial system because an algorithm flagged you as “risky.”
No payment processor should be able to fine you for “misinformation” or wrong-think.
These are not hypothetical risks. They’re happening right now in other countries — and starting to happen here.
Florida drew a line in the sand.
The question is whether the rest of America will do the same — or sleepwalk into a surveillance state where every purchase is monitored and freedom is one frozen account away from extinction.
I know what I’m choosing.
I’m choosing freedom.
I’m choosing privacy.
I’m choosing a future where my kids can spend their hard-earned money without Big Brother or Big Tech watching every transaction.
Florida made the first move. Now it’s your state’s turn.
I want to present you one of the most interesting sites, where you will see new articles daily! www.321gold.com
“This article was created for educational purposes”
Predicting outright state collapse is inherently uncertain, but by 2040 several countries face materially elevated risk of severe state failure or collapse of central authority—meaning loss of effective governance over significant territory, large-scale internal conflict, or fragmentation. The following list identifies countries widely judged vulnerable by analysts, with the dominant factors driving risk for each. This is a probabilistic assessment (not a deterministic forecast); risks arise from combinations of governance failure, economic stress, demography, external interference, and climate and resource shocks.
High-risk (elevated probability of major failure or fragmentation by 2040)
Sudan
Key drivers: persistent civil war since 2023 between military and multiple paramilitary factions; fractured elites; collapsed economy; humanitarian catastrophe; regional proxy interventions; armed militias controlling territory. Absent a credible peace process and restoration of basic services, continued fragmentation and local warlord rule remain likely.
Libya
Key drivers: enduring rival governments and militias since 2011; localized war economies centered on oil; weak institutions; foreign military involvement from regional powers; fragmented security forces. Elections and stabilization have repeatedly failed; continuation of de facto partition or recurring armed confrontations is plausible.
Somalia
Key drivers: decades of weak central institutions; resilient Islamist insurgency (al-Shabaab); clan fragmentation; recurring drought and food crises; limited revenue base and heavy external dependence. Federal government holds territory intermittently; risk centers on further territorial losses to non-state actors and de facto regional autonomy.
Yemen
Key drivers: prolonged civil war (Houthi vs. internationally recognized government and southern movements), foreign intervention (Saudi/UAE, Iran-backed dynamics), collapsed public services, famine risk, and multiple competing authorities in north and south. A negotiated nationwide settlement before 2040 is possible but not assured; continued partition or frozen conflict is likely without major shifts.
Significant-concern (substantial vulnerability, where collapse is a realistic tail outcome under adverse shocks)
Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC)
Key drivers: vast territory with weak state reach, numerous armed groups in the east, fragile institutions, resource-driven local conflicts, poor infrastructure, and refugee flows. A regional conflagration or intensified localized state retreat could yield large-scale governance collapse in parts of the country.
Haiti
Key drivers: chronic political instability, powerful gangs controlling large urban areas (Port-au-Prince), weak security forces, economic collapse, natural disasters, and limited institutional capacity. Without decisive security reform and economic stabilization, de facto governance vacuums and quasi-failed-state dynamics will likely persist or worsen.
Afghanistan
Key drivers: the Taliban’s hold since 2021 has not produced unified, durable governance across ethnic lines; economic collapse, international isolation, insurgent pockets, factionalism, and climate-driven shocks. The risk is not classic internationalized collapse but fragmentation, governance breakdown in provinces, and potential return of competing armed groups.
South Sudan
Key drivers: weak institutions since independence, ethnicized politics, recurrent violence, dependence on oil revenues, poor service delivery, and climate stress on pastoralist livelihoods. Recurrent localized breakdowns remain likely; a full reversion to widespread civil war is a significant tail risk.
Medium-concern (fragility that could tip under severe economic, political, or climate shocks)
Lebanon
Key drivers: economic meltdown, currency collapse, sectarian/political paralysis, refugee burden, and state delegitimization. Collapse into prolonged governance paralysis and localized militias is possible if economic conditions and patronage networks deteriorate further.
Pakistan
Key drivers: economic crisis, political-military friction, extremist insurgency pockets, water scarcity, and institutional fragility. Full state collapse is low-probability, but severe governance crises, localized breakdowns, or loss of state capacity in border regions could occur under large shocks.
Nigeria
Key drivers: insurgency in the northeast (Boko Haram/IS affiliate), banditry and farmer–herder conflict in the middle belt, separatist pressures in the southeast, weak logistics and constrained fiscal space. Collapse of the whole state is unlikely, but protracted fragmentation or long-term erosion of state authority in large regions is a material risk.
Cross-cutting systemic factors that increase collapse risk
Weak political institutions and elite fragmentation: personalized rule, lack of legitimate inter-group power-sharing, or competing centers of power increase likelihood of violence and devolution of authority.
Economic collapse and fiscal insolvency: hyperinflation, loss of export revenue (commodity shocks), unsustainable debt, and inability to pay security forces degrade state capacity rapidly.
Prolonged armed conflict and proliferation of non-state armed actors: when militias, insurgents, or criminal gangs control territory and revenue streams, central authority becomes nominal.
External interference and proxy wars: foreign militaries, weapons flows, and proxy backers extend and complicate domestic conflicts, preventing settlement.
Climate change and resource stress: droughts, floods, crop failures, and water scarcity exacerbate displacement, food insecurity, and competition over land.
Demographic pressures and youth unemployment: large cohorts of unemployed young people create recruitment pools for armed groups and increase social volatility.
Humanitarian crises and displacement: mass refugee movements and internal displacement overload state and regional systems, eroding legitimacy and control.
How to interpret this assessment
Collapse is not binary; states often move into zones of partial failure where central control coexists with autonomous regions, militia rule, or competing authorities. The list above highlights countries where such severe deterioration is plausible by 2040 if current trajectories persist or if adverse shocks occur.
Time horizons and probabilities matter: some countries face near-term high risk (next few years), others face chronic fragility that could tip under repeated or large shocks before 2040.
External and internal policy choices matter: international mediation, targeted economic support, inclusive political settlements, and climate adaptation can materially change trajectories.
Indicators to watch through 2040 (early warning)
Sharp collapse in government revenue and public-sector payrolls (security forces unpaid).
Loss of monopoly on violence in large population centers or resource-producing regions.
Rapid increases in internally displaced people and refugee flows across borders.
Significant foreign military bases, covert arms flows, or open proxy deployments.
Breakdown in basic services (electricity, health, food distribution) for sustained periods.
Sources and limits
This assessment synthesizes patterns observed in conflict studies, fragile-states indices, UN humanitarian reporting, and regional expert analyses through May 2024. New diplomatic settlements, reform breakthroughs, or large-scale international interventions could alter trajectories before 2040.
If you have any dissatisfaction with my content, you can tell me here and I will fix the problem, because I care about every reader and even more so about your opinion!
I want to present you one of the most interesting sites, where you will see new articles daily! www.321gold.com
Planning for prolonged food shortages requires shifting from emergency thinking to resilient systems: diversify food sources, secure storage and production capacity, and build skills and community networks. The following actionable strategies cover immediate preparedness, medium-term resilience, and long-term self-reliance.
Mindset and priorities – Prioritize nutritional density and calories: focus on a mix of storable staples (calories) and nutrient-rich items (protein, fat, vitamins). – Resilience > perfection: redundancy across food, water, fuel, skills, and social support is more important than having one “perfect” supply. – Security and locality: plan based on realistic local risks (climate, supply lines, social stability).
Short-term food stockpiling (3–12 months) – Staples to store:
Grains: rice, wheat, rolled oats, cornmeal.
Legumes: dried beans, lentils, peas.
Fats: vegetable oil, ghee, coconut oil.
Sugar/honey, powdered milk, canned meats/fish, canned vegetables and fruits.
Salt, baking soda/powder, vinegar, yeast.
Storage best practices:
Use oxygen- and moisture-proof containers (Mylar bags + oxygen absorbers, food-grade buckets with gamma-seal lids).
Store in cool, dark, dry places; rotate stock using FIFO (first in, first out).
Perennial and low-maintenance foods: fruit trees, berry bushes, asparagus, rhubarb.
Seed saving: keep open-pollinated/non-hybrid seeds; store properly (cool, dry, dark).
Protein sources:
Poultry (chickens for eggs/meat) — small flock yields quick returns.
Rabbits — efficient meat producers for small spaces.
Fishponds or aquaponics where feasible.
Foraging and wild edibles—learn local species, seasons, and safe preparation.
Soil and fertility:
Composting (hot composting to kill pathogens), vermiculture (worm bins), green manures and cover crops.
Learn and practice crop rotation to reduce pests/diseases.
Water resilience:
Rainwater harvesting (legalities permitting), storage tanks, drip irrigation for efficiency.
Greywater reuse systems for irrigation where allowed.
Skills and tools – Food-prep and preservation skills: pressure canning, fermenting (sauerkraut, kimchi), lacto-fermentation, smoking, curing, drying. – Basic animal husbandry: coop design, feeding, health checks, slaughtering and butchering. – Gardening skills: seed starting, soil testing, grafting, pest management without synthetic chemicals. – Mechanical and energy skills: basic carpentry, small engine repair, solar panel installation, alternative cooking methods (rocket stove, efficient woodstove). – Medical and food-safety knowledge: wound care, dehydration treatment, safe water handling, canning safety.
Community and barter systems – Build local networks: neighborhood food-shares, tool libraries, skill exchanges, cooperative gardens. – Establish trustworthy barter items: preserved food, fuel, seeds, tools, medicines, batteries, skills (mechanic, carpenter, midwife). – Organize communal storage and production to pool labor and risk (community-rooted resilience is more robust than isolated stockpiles).
Security and risk reduction – Keep a low profile for stored supplies: avoid advertising holdings, use dispersal (divide stocks among trusted locations). – Diversify food sources across home, community, and possibly rental garden plots to reduce single-point failures. – Maintain basic defensive awareness and conflict-avoidance plans; avoid unnecessary escalation.
Financial and practical preparations – Convert some financial reserves into tangible, nonperishable assets: long-term food, seeds, fuel, tools. – Maintain small denominations of cash and barterable items; learn local currencies and informal exchange norms. – Prioritize portability: have a compact 72-hour kit for emergency mobility and a separate longer-term supply.
Psychological and household planning – Establish household roles and an emergency plan: who tends animals, who manages water, who preserves food. – Practice drills for rationing, garden succession planting, and alternative cooking methods to avoid surprises.
Low-cost, high-impact investments – Pressure canner, water filter (ceramic or multi-stage), high-quality seeds, sturdy hand tools, chest freezer with generator backup where electricity is reliable. – Fuel-efficient cookstove or rocket stove, solar oven, or small solar generator for essential power.
If starting from near-zero: practical entry sequence
Build a 1–3 month emergency food and water supply.
Add a small livestock project (backyard chickens).
Expand storage to 6–12 months while growing community ties.
Examples and typical stories
Urban balcony gardener who grew potatoes in containers, kept hens on a rooftop coop, and preserved surplus by fermenting and canning—reduced grocery dependence by ~60% in one season.
Small rural cooperative that pooled rainwater tanks, ran a shared greenhouse and root-cellar, and organized regular seed exchanges—maintained food supply through a local market collapse.
Caveats and legalities
Follow local laws about rainwater collection, livestock in residential zones, and foraging protected areas.
Food safety matters: improperly canned foods can cause botulism; follow tested recipes and procedures.
Outcome goals
Short-term survival: sufficient calories, clean water, and basic medicines for the household.
Medium-term stability: 6–24 months of supplies plus productive garden/animals and preservation capacity.
Long-term resilience: community networks, seed sovereignty, diversified food production and stored reserves enabling multi-year continuity.
Recommended next practical actions (immediate)
Buy a pressure canner or learn where to access one; store 3 months of staples; start a small raised-bed garden and save seeds from first harvests.
I want to present you one of the most interesting sites, where you will see new articles daily! www.321gold.com
People of the world at present can define what is recession and what is inflation. We all want to survive or recover. We do not want to have another great depression. As described in Wikipedia, the great depression was a worldwide economic downturn from 1929 and ending at different times in the 1930s and 1940s. This happened in most places of the different countries. It was known to be the largest and the most severe economic depression in the 20th century. Whenever there is a decline in the world’s economy, that great depression is used as an example of the extent of the decline that the world’s economy can actually have. There is always the other side of a story. Therefore, there is also, the other side of the life of the great depression. The other side that I am referring to are the reflections and lessons we can gain from it.
Life during the great depression was not easy. It was at this time that people – rich or poor became very vulnerable to the effect of the great depression. Rich or poor looked for means on how to survive the great depression. Both of them have experienced severe economic financial crisis and both of them sought for a crisis management plan. So, the first reflection that we can have is that reach or poor are affected and that life during the great depression crosses boundaries of culture, money, and race. Our being human is what remains to be there. Second reflection, although the rich people are affected, it is the poor who are greatly affected. Good for the rich people because they still have something to get from their pocket whenever their stomachs are hungry. The poor becomes poorer each day until some are starving already. Third reflection that I have is that people are the ones who cause the great depression and we are also the ones who suffer.
Another side of the life during the great depression are the lessons we can learn out of it. These lessons are:
Frugality.
We should learn how to be thrifty. Let us learn the lesson of the fable “The Ant and the Grasshopper.” The ant saves for rainy days, the grasshopper don’t. In this case, who are we then? Are we more of an ant or more of a grasshopper. Prioritize your needs. Never ever confuse your needs and wants.
Discipline.
Control your desires. Do not ever think that because you have a credit line, you will have to engage in debts. Be guided by the quote “Don’t spend money you don’t already have in your pocket.” More importantly, do not engage in gambling. “A gambler always loses.” If you have money, do not be a one day millionaire. You spend it all for one day and you suffer on the succeeding days.
Hard work.
Many times, we want to avoid chores. Why don’t you do the tasks which you can. Imagine how much you will be able to save when you do your part.
The people during the great depression have learned new mental attitude. Aside from the characteristics mentioned above, they were able to realize the value of close relationships with their immediate family, relatives, friends, and with God. The high-priced lesson they have is actually being able to realize that mo re import to material things are the quality of relationships that they build with their fellowmen. And this is the essence of the other side of the life during the great depression.
While everybody is losing money, jobs and properties would you believe that some people are at their best during recession? Be one of the people who discovered the secret to achieve true wealth during recession.
If you have any dissatisfaction with my content, you can tell me here and I will fix the problem, because I care about every reader and even more so about your opinion!
I want to present you one of the most interesting sites, where you will see new articles daily! www.321gold.com
WARNING! Watching The Following Video Will Give You Access To Knowledge The Government Does NOT Want You To Know About
Even some of our brightest scientific minds are projecting that there is absolutely no positive future for our civilization if we stay on our current course. Perhaps one of the reasons why our society has become so obsessed with short-term results is because most of us can’t bear to think about the long-term consequences of our actions. I have a website that focuses on “economic collapse”, but it isn’t just the economy that is headed for catastrophe. Virtually every aspect of our society is coming apart at the seams all around us, and the era that we are moving into will be more nightmarish than most people would dare to imagine. But our political leaders continue to insist that everything is going to work out just fine somehow, and most people choose to believe them.
In, an old MIT study from 1972 that projected that our civilization will collapse at some point during the 21st century made headlines on several major news sites…
In 1972, a team of MIT scientists got together to study the risks of civilizational collapse. Their system dynamics model published by the Club of Rome identified impending ‘limits to growth’ (LtG) that meant industrial civilization was on track to collapse sometime within the 21st century, due to overexploitation of planetary resources.
In particular, the study identified a period of time “around 2040” when societal collapse would be very likely…
The study was published in the Yale Journal of Industrial Ecology in November 2020 and is available on the KPMG website. It concludes that the current business-as-usual trajectory of global civilization is heading toward the terminal decline of economic growth within the coming decade—and at worst, could trigger societal collapse by around 2040.
Of course events are not going to transpire exactly as they foresaw, but as far as the big picture is concerned they were right on the money.
Our society is now in the process of collapsing all around us, and you can see evidence of this everywhere that you look.
Last years , civil unrest is causing widespread chaos in the streets in Cuba, South Africa, Beirut and Paris. We have entered a period of time when it seems like people are perpetually angry, and the wild scenes that are playing out around the globe are absolutely shocking.
Meanwhile, we are dealing with the worst epidemic of illegal drugs in our history. If you can believe it, drug overdose deaths were up nearly 30 percent last year…
Drug-overdose deaths in the U.S. surged nearly 30% in the last years, the tragic result of a deadlier supply and the destabilizing effects of the Covid-19 pandemic, according to preliminary federal data and public health officials.
Drug overdose deaths were already at an all-time high coming into 2024.
So for the number of deaths to rise 30 percent above that level in just one year is really, really tragic.
The corporate media should accept responsibility for their role in provoking these attacks.
For years, the corporate media has been relentlessly demonizing conservative Christians, and churches are the most visible symbols of conservative Christian culture in our society.
As the corporate media continues to blame conservative Christians for society’s ills, it is inevitable that there will be more attacks on churches in the future.
But of course there will be more violence everywhere around us as our society continues to steadily unravel.
I have never seen as much anger, frustration and hate as I am seeing right now, and there is no future for a society in which virtually everyone is filled with rage.
The years ahead are going to be extremely chaotic, and I would suggest that you plan accordingly.
So the old adage goes anyway, and for the prepper – the one who’s keeping abreast of current events – cash is one of the last man-made means of protection that he or she has against governments that have grown to a degree of power that they never had before.
The Dangers of a Cashless Society
There are two predominant dangers that come with a cashless society, and just about every negative that you can think of due to such will fall into one of these two groups:
Denial of purchasing power
A complete loss of anonymity
Denial of Purchasing Power
A cashless society is a controlled society. If everything must go through an online banking or credit card process, then you have just lost virtually all control over what you buy.
Anything that is not politically sanctioned(guns, ammo, body armor, helmets, particular books, particular website premium subscriptions, political donations, etc.) could very easily be vaporized overnight.
This, of course, would drive the makers and holders of such products into a black market to barter their goods, and this in turn would be responded to by the use of overwhelming government force. This will come in the form of Stryker vehicles, concussion grenades, snipers, and men with automatic rifles and body armor.
Don’t believe me? Read FA Hayek’s The Road to Serfdom. Totalitarian governments must resort to force simply for the sole reason that people will naturally refuse to comply with widespread theft of their own goods. This force will only continue to grow in its usage.
Totalitarians do not accept blame for their own economical failures. The state is the end of all things to them, and as such, the end justifies the means – no matter how terrifying such a means may be.
A Complete Loss of Anonymity
Once cash is abolished everywhere, your attempts at any form of anonymity will be destroyed.
You already have an amazing amount of data that has been collected from you from your Internet search history, GPS data, voting history, bank statements, credit card statements, phone data, and a host of other publicly available information that easily allows people to deduce information from you.
And where humans fail, algorithms thrive. I have a hobby interest in algorithm creation (particularly multiple linear regression analysis) and have used it within my healthcare job as a means of predicting patient attendance rather accurately on any given day. I’ve also used them to (somewhat less accurately) predict when a patient was going to have episodes of heart block.
Algorithms are a powerful tool, and the more data you feed them, the stronger they get. With the amount of data that has been collected on you already, the government may be able to make a much stronger prediction about who you are, what you believe, and what you possess than you would’ve ever thought possible.
Just think about what a cashless society would mean for the following purchases:
Medicine – The government can now invade your medical privacy to see what meds you need to live as well as know what could either improve or hamper your condition. For those who don’t believe that this is a concern, just keep in mind that it wasn’t that long ago that the US military was warning its soldiers against getting genetic testing to determine their family tree. Why? Because it was deemed to be a security risk. What do they know here that we don’t?
Food – Algorithms can easily predict when you are buying much more than what you could eat within a particular span of time. This then means that food stores can be predicted and located. Come disaster time, your house could easily be one of the first that is targeted for “hoarding”. And what happens if it’s determined that those with large food stores are likely to be “domestic terrorists”?
Firearms and Body Armor – This is the low-hanging fruit here. Weapons, ammunition, body armor – they could all be easily tracked (and later confiscated). Buying “too much” of one particular product may cause red flags to be attached to your file, and you could very easily end up with a visit from an alphabet agency full of men carrying what is now a felony for you to own.
Ham Radios – There already seems to be an attack against ham radio users as the government has realized that this is the route that many fearing censorship/silencing are turning toward. If you can shut down all communication other than what is government sanctioned, you have effectively silenced free speech.
Media – Do you like to watch documentaries that may be labeled as conspiracy theories? Is it that hard to imagine a “misinformation tax” to discourage Americans from imbibing in certain forms of media? Why not? We’ve already seen the “death by a thousand cuts” approach being used with firearms so that the argument can be made that “no, you can have a gun, but you just have to fill out these fifty forms, pay a $4000 fee, and have a license. See? There’s no infringement whatsoever.”
To think that the same idea couldn’t be applied to the news commentators that you like to listen to is naive.
Here are some arguments that will be used for a cashless society:
Physical Money Shortages
Throughout 2020 we were told that there was a coin shortage throughout the U.S.
As a result, retailers either quit giving coin change back or strongly discouraged customers from asking for it.
Kroger actually resorted to either giving you back your money in the form of credit vouchers (to that particular store of course) or by donating the change that they owed you to charity.
Control Over Dangerous and Illegal Purchases
In what can only be viewed as an incredibly ironic wordsmithing, we will be told that one of the benefits to a cashless society is that we can finally rein in purchases that are deemed by the government to be dangerous to the public.
Guns, ammunition, freedom-oriented books (“radical terrorist recruiting material”), and the like will be argued against so that we can keep our society safe. Notice that there is always an emphasis on safety throughout this entire process.
A Fomite of Disease
Once again, 2020 set the stage here. Cash purchases plummeted worldwide, with credit cards filling in the void as people began to avoid any and all cash purchases with the hopes of not getting themselves sick.
This was a talking point spouted throughout the mainstream media in 2020 and will continue to be used in the future as the push for the abolition of cash continues.
Cost of Creation Outweighs the Actual Value of Money
We see this already with the US penny. It actually costs 2.41₵ to produce a single penny.
While our government currently has no problem with making fiscally irresponsible decisions, when it finally does come around to deciding that “you know what, pennies aren’t worth it” – or any other form of cash for that matter – there will be nobody that will argue against them.
This decision will be portrayed as a means of reducing wasteful spending, and anyone who argues against this given reasoning for the abolition of cash will be labeled as an idiot who can’t do proper math.
Less Risk of Theft
We don’t often hear this argument being made currently, but it is out there.
The argument goes that if you’re mugged while you’re carrying $300 in cash, you simply lose all of your money.
However, if you’re mugged and all you have on you is your credit card, then you can quickly call the credit card company, cancel your card, and be reimbursed for any disputed charges that were made in the interim.
What Can We Do to Fight This Process?
While I do believe that a cashless society is inevitable, I do think that there are things we can do to fight against it and to slow it down.
Here is what we can do as freedom and privacy-loving Americans.
#1. You Need to Make Friends with Like-Minded People Now
I used to always blow off this idea. It wasn’t until I began talking with Forest of Prepper Net that I began to see the light on this issue. If you don’t have like-minded friends, you’re going to be up a creek without a paddle when a cashless society hits.
You need to know who has what skills, who has what goods, who can get what, and where their sympathies lie. Perhaps this is more of a cashless society survival skill, but nevertheless, refusal to comply is still a means of fighting against a cashless society.
And this isn’t just refusal to comply based on principal. This is refusal to comply because to do otherwise would mean certain death. When you’re not allowed into a store to buy food and other necessary goods for your family because you refuse to use Fedcoins for purchase or refuse to show a vaccination card you better be dang sure that you have some alternate means of getting what you need to live.
History has proven such. Read the diary of Anne Frank. Had Otto Frank (her father) not had connections with like-minded (this is key) people throughout his neighborhood well prior to his going into hiding with his family, they would’ve died well before the Nazis came and took them away.
Listen to what Good Patriot out of Texas has to say in her Fighting Back videos on Telegram. She’s echoing this same thought process. You need to make groupings of people who can work together to combat this evil.
#2. Develop Some Means of Production
Both Ayn Rand and Adam Smith harped on the fact that production is what equals true wealth. Whether it’s learning how to raise livestock, how to work with leather, how to tan hides, you need to learn some means of production so that you can still produce wealth when cash is taken from you.
You still have to eat. You still have to put bread on the table. And there are going to be others out there who have principles and love logic who will be of the same mind as you. They are going to want to trade for supplies. Barter will come back in full force. You’ll need to have some means of producing something of value so that you can get what you need.
#3. Invest in Precious Metals
Robert Kiyosaki harps upon this in his new book, Fake, the reason being, that precious metals have intrinsic value. They’ve been used as a form of money for roughly 6,000 years now, and they’re not going to stop being a store of value anytime soon. Within a barter society, this may be one of your best stores of wealth.
On top of this, over 40% of the US dollar supply has been printed within the past year alone. Every other economist you see is screaming about the signs of inflation. The U.S. dollar is about to collapse. There is no longer any denying it. Inflation has already risen drastically and will only continue to grow worse. You need to begin doing something to protect your wealth from inflation.
Precious metals are part of the solution.
#4. Start Using Masked Payments
If you don’t have one already, you need to set up a Privacy.com account. This is a form of masked debit card that will help to keep your purchases anonymous. Yes, this is a form of cashless payment, but it is still a way to fight against such a monster.
Provided that money is flowing out of your account but nobody can tell who you just bought from or what you bought, you’ll be much safer in your transaction privacy.
#5. Refuse to Cater to Businesses that Don’t Permit Cash Transactions
If you tug on their purse strings, they eventually change their mind. I’m sorry, but when good compromises with evil, evil wins. Do what you can to avoid these businesses like the plague, and then let them know why you’re avoiding them.
I used to carry around business cards detailing why I wouldn’t support businesses with ‘’no gun’’ stickers on the front doors. I’ve since ran out. I think that such a business card for businesses that don’t permit cash transactions would be an easy way to voice one’s displeasure as well.
Here’s a sample card template:
“I consider your refusal to accept cash as un-American, a forced invasion of my privacy, and a totalitarian tool. As such, I will cease from doing any business with you for the near future and will be spending my money at your competitors instead.”
This is similar to the language that I used within my Second Amendment business cards. I bought them easily off of Vistaprint (around 500 for $20 or so) and considered the money worth every penny.
#6. Learn How to Grow Your Own Food
There’s already a movement afoot within the U.S. to keep certain types of people out of grocery stores. Vaccination papers are beginning to be asked for before one gains access to certain venues or hotel chains. It won’t be long until cashless payments are the only means of accessing even groceries.
Because of this, I highly recommend that you learn how to grow most of your own food, and begin learning now. Gardening has quite a learning curve and is nowhere near as easy as Michael Bloomberg would have you believe. You need to ensure that your family can eat, and gardening is a great part of that process.
Final Thoughts
A cashless society truly is a scary world. Picture everything that you’ve read about in history books within other totalitarian regimes, and you’ll get a taste of what is to come. I implore you to do something now to protect yourself against the rolling stone that is coming down the mountain right for you.
If you follow the above advice, you’ll help to ease the blow. And there’s no doubt about it – it will be a smack in the face. But we can’t just sit back and do nothing as privacy dies a quiet death inside what was once the freest nation on Earth.
If you’ve found other ways to combat a cashless society that we did not cover within this article, by all means, please let us and others know within the comments. This is about helping our fellow man, and as much input is needed as possible.
Preppgroup 